The KRDS Benefit Analysis Toolkit: Development and Application

نویسندگان

  • Neil Beagrie
  • Monica Duke
  • Catherine Hardman
  • Dipak Kalra
  • Brian Lavoie
  • Manjula Patel
  • Liz Lyon
  • Matthew Woollard
چکیده

This paper provides an overview of the KRDS Benefit Analysis Toolkit. The Toolkit has been developed to assist curation activities by assessing the benefits associated with the long-term preservation of research data. It builds on the outputs of the Keeping Research Data Safe (KRDS) research projects and consists of two tools: the KRDS Benefits Framework, and the Value-chain and Benefits Impact tool. Each tool consists of a more detailed guide and worksheet(s). Both tools have drawn on partner case studies and previous work on benefits and impact for digital curation and preservation. This experience has provided a series of common examples of generic benefits that are employed in both tools for users to modify or add to as required. International Journal of Digital Curation (2012), 7(2), 64–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.230 The International Journal of Digital Curation is an international journal committed to scholarly excellence and dedicated to the advancement of digital curation across a wide range of sectors. The IJDC is published by UKOLN at the University of Bath and is a publication of the Digital Curation Centre. ISSN: 1746-8256. URL: http://www.ijdc.net/ doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.230 Neil Beagrie et al 65 The KRDS Benefit Analysis Toolkit was developed to assist curation activities by assessing the benefits associated with the long-term preservation of research data. Organisations in the Higher Education sector are facing increasing demands to demonstrate their effectiveness and significant return-on-investment of public funds. This is often expressed in terms of innovation and impact on the economy and society, but extends to specific investments in digital curation and preservation of research data. Enhancing the ability to demonstrate benefits, value and impact in this context is paramount, and the Benefit Analysis Toolkit is designed to support that requirement. The Benefit Analysis Toolkit builds on the Keeping Research Data Safe 2 (KRDS2) report (Beagrie, Lavoie & Woollard, 2010), which introduced a general Benefits Framework to aid the high-level characterization of the benefits from preserving valuable research data. Development of the Toolkit has been funded by JISC as part of the KRDS/I2S2 Digital Preservation Benefit Analysis Tools Project. The project has tested, reviewed and developed further the KRDS2 Benefits Framework and the KRDS/I2S2 Value Chain and Benefit Impact Analysis tools for assessing the benefits of digital curation/preservation of research data. It has also extended their utility and wider adoption by providing detailed user guidance, worked examples for the tools and creating an integrated Toolkit. Figure 1. The KRDS Benefits Toolkit. © Charles Beagrie and project partners 2011 The Toolkit consists of two tools: the KRDS Benefits Framework, and the Valuechain and Benefits Impact tool. Each tool consists of a more detailed guide and worksheet(s). Both tools have drawn on partner case studies and previous work on benefits and impact for digital curation/preservation. This experience has provided a series of common examples of generic benefits that are employed in both tools for users to modify or add to as required. 1 KRDS/I2S2 Digital Preservation Benefit Analysis Tools Project website: http://beagrie.com/krdsi2s2.php The International Journal of Digital Curation Volume 7, Issue 2 | 2012 66 The KRDS Benefit Analysis doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.230 Figure 2. The KRDS Benefits Framework. © Charles Beagrie and project partners 2011. The KRDS Benefits Framework is a tool for identifying, assessing and communicating the benefits from investing resources in the curation/long-term preservation of research data. The Framework employs a simply structured, easily understood format, and is intended to aid internal discussions amongst project staff, as well as to support discussions between project staff and external stakeholders, such as university administrators or funding organisations. The Framework can assist in prioritizing alternative curation investments and justifying data curation costs within funding applications. The Benefits Framework organises potential benefits from the curation/preservation of research data along three broad dimensions: the outcome achieved; when the outcome is achieved; and who benefits from the outcome. Assessing a data curation activity’s benefits, as well as communicating these benefits to stakeholders, requires a clear understanding of the fundamental elements of the activity’s value proposition. In short, the “what”, “when” and “who” of the value proposition must be identified and described. The second component of the Toolkit is the Value Chain and Benefits Impact Tool. Once benefits are identified and organised within the Benefits Framework, further work can proceed aimed at identifying potential measures or illustrations of the value and impact of those benefits. This next stage is supported by the Value-Chain and Benefits Impact Tool. This can be used in assessing where value is added to outputs in a chain of activities, and for use in evaluation, strategic and organisational planning, and reporting. The Tool helps identify quantitative metrics and qualitative indicators for the impact of benefits and optionally supports a value-chain analysis. It uses the KRDS Activity Model (part of the KRDS Cost Framework; see Beagrie, Chruszcz & Lavoie, 2008) as a starting point for the value-chain analysis, so it is ideal for the specific needs of research data and its curation/preservation. A detailed user guide and two worksheets have been provided with the Tool; the Benefits Impact worksheet and the Value-chain and Benefits Impact worksheet. Both worksheets have been prepopulated with a selection of common generic benefits also used in the Benefits Framework Tool; these can be reviewed, deleted or enhanced as needed. The tool has been designed to be generic but easily configurable by the user for their specific needs or application. The International Journal of Digital Curation Volume 7, Issue 2 | 2012 doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.230 Neil Beagrie et al 67 Figure 3. Potential uses for the Toolkit and its component tools.© Charles Beagrie and project partners 2011. The KRDS Benefit Analysis Toolkit was reviewed and tested through a partnershipwith a number of institutions, including the Centre for Health Informatics and Multi-Professional Education (CHIME), the UK Data Archive, and the Archaeology DataService, and the SageCite Project. In addition, a dissemination workshop was held onJuly 12, 2011 in London, where a variety of participants offered commentary on theToolkit and its uses. (Charles Beagrie Limited, 2011)Prudent investment of resources in data curation activities requires a thoroughanalysis of both costs and benefits. The KRDS Cost Framework supplies the tools toaddress the former; the KRDS Benefit Analysis Toolkit fills a longstanding gap interms of the availability of tools to address the latter. Taken together, the KRDS suiteof tools allows practitioners to conduct cost/benefit analysis of their data curationactivities, and to use the results of this analysis to inform internal decision-making, aswell as communicate value and impact to external stakeholders such as fundingorganizations. ReferencesBeagrie, N., Chruszcz, J., & Lavoie, B. (2008). Keeping research data safe. Retrievedfrom http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/keepingresearchdatasafe0408.pdf Beagrie, N., Lavoie, B., & Woollard, M. (2010). Keeping research data safe 2.Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.pdf Charles Beagrie Limited. (2011). Report and presentations from the JISC DigitalCuration/Preservation Benefits Tools Project Dissemination workshop. Retrievedfrom http://blog.beagrie.com/2011/07/18/report-and-presentations-from-the-jisc-digital-curationpreservation-benefits-tools-project-dissemination-workshop/ The International Journal of Digital CurationVolume 7, Issue 2 | 2012

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

KRDS--a tetrapeptide derived from lactotransferrin--inhibits binding of monoclonal antibody against glycoprotein IIb-IIIa on ADP-stimulated platelets and megakaryocytes.

Short peptides isolated from fibrinogen and K-casein have been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation and fibrinogen binding to stimulated platelets. We studied the effects of synthetic peptides occurring in milk proteins (bovine K-casein, KNQDK, and human lactotransferrin, KRDS) and in fibrinogen (RGDS and L10) on subsequent binding of monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) against the glycoprotein (GP) ...

متن کامل

Calculation of Positron Distribution in the Presence of a Uniform Magnetic Field for the Improvement of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging Using GEANT4 Toolkit

Introduction Range and diffusion of positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals are important parameters for image resolution in positron emission tomography (PET). In this study, GEANT4 toolkit was applied to study positron diffusion in soft tissues with and without a magnetic field for six commonly used isotopes in PET imaging including 11C, 13N, 15O, 18F, 68Ga, and 82Rb. Materials and Methods GEA...

متن کامل

Creating Annotation Tools with the Annotation Graph Toolkit

The Annotation Graph Toolkit is a collection of software supporting the development of annotation tools based on the annotation graph model. The toolkit includes application programming interfaces for manipulating annotation graph data and for importing data from other formats. There are interfaces for the scripting languages Tcl and Python, a database interface, specialized graphical user inte...

متن کامل

Tinkertoy parallel programming: a case study with Zoltan

As the need for complex parallel simulation software grows, better strategies for efficient and effective software development become important. We advocate a toolkitor ‘tinkertoy’-approach to parallel application development. By providing efficient implementations of basic services commonly needed by applications, toolkits allow application developers to benefit from others’ research, compare ...

متن کامل

Group Dynamic Assessment in an EFL Classroom: Do Secondary Interactants Benefit?

This study aimed to investigate the application of Group Dynamic Assessment (GDA) to writing accuracy of EFL learners and explore whether secondary interactants could benefit from interactions between mediator and primary interactants. The idea of implementing DA (Dynamic Assessment) in dyads seems unworkable since teachers are required to teach the whole class (Guk & Kellog, 2007). Moreover, L...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • IJDC

دوره 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012